Your Monday Reality Check-A mountain of misinformation

June 17, 2012 | Glenn Clark

Your Monday Reality Check-A mountain of misinformation

I honestly still can’t believe some of the things I read/heard/saw last week about Baltimore Ravens OT Bryant McKinnie.

If you missed it, McKinnie was not on the fall last week in Owings Mills during mandatory minicamp at the Under Armour Performance Center. When asked why McKinnie was not practicing, head coach John Harbaugh said “Bryant McKinnie is a guy that we held out just for conditioning purposes. We’re going to probably continue to do that and continue to try and get him in good shape. I think practice-wise, he’s just as well doing the conditioning part of it.”

Let me start this post by saying I fully understand a few things. One is that Harbaugh has never felt the need to share more information than necessary about any of his players. Another is that the information was new to reporters, so asking follow up questions might not have seemed pertinent. I wasn’t present at minicamp (media availability was scheduled during my radio show “The Reality Check” on AM1570 WNST.net each day) and was unable to fully grasp exactly what was going on.

With no media availability scheduled before the start of Training Camp, reporters felt it necessary to question Harbaugh later in the week for more information about McKinnie’s status. Unfortunately the coach was again vague, offering “we will leave that between us. That’s something that is an in-house type of thing right now. Bryant has done a good job, he’s worked hard. It’s not as simple as some of you guys want to make it. It’s just a situation where we are going to do what is best for the team, what is best for Bryant. We want him here; there’s no reason he wouldn’t be here. He has worked hard, so you try to do what’s most beneficial for every guy in every situation, and it’s always individualized.”

Now’s the part where I offer some examples of various stories I’ve read about Bryant McKinnie.

Here’s this from SI.com…

“Cut last season by the Vikings, Bryant McKinnie, who sat out Thursday’s practice, may be on the verge of extending an ignominious streak. Here is a player who has a history of being overweight and struggled with the same problem last season. He also reportedly has financial problems, yet can’t get into good enough shape to participate in minicamp. You have to question his commitment and when a team starts signing veteran offensive linemen and McKinnie gets held out of minicamp, it could be a sign of things to come.”

And this from SB Nation…

“The Baltimore Ravens gave veteran left tackle Bryant McKinnie a $500,000 roster bonus earlier this spring, but now might be regretting the outlay of cash. McKinnie came to Baltimore after the Minnesota Vikings cut him last summer for reporting to camp overweight. The Ravens rounded him into shape and he had a pretty solid year, allowing the team to shift Michael Oher over to right tackle and solidify that side of the offensive line.

McKinnie reportedly was on his way to getting in good shape earlier this year, but the most recent news was that the team held him out of the mini-camp this past week for “conditioning reasons.” This does not bode well for either the Ravens nor McKinnie.

Bryant is on the short end of a legal case where he defaulted on a $4 million loan he took out during the NFL Lockout last year and seriously needs a full season paycheck to pay it back. If he does not report to the Ravens Training Camp in six weeks in excellent shape, there is a very good chance that the team may decide to cut ties with him and let him go.”

Allow me to be fair again for a second. The SI.com blurb was a clear re-write with no author attached. While SB Nation does have a handful of experienced journalists and columnists, their sites are still largely made up of part-time writers/editors with no actual experience truly covering a team.

So perhaps CSNBaltimore.com’s veteran writer Ray Frager would be a better source.

“Offensive tackle Bryant McKinnie’s conditioning issues have been a big part of the Ravens chatter over this week. There is speculation he is around that 400-pound summit that caused him to lose his job in Minnesota.”

Maybe even the Baltimore Sun’s Mike Preston would be a better option.

“The entire McKinnie episode is strange and you wonder if he is going to be around when training camp opens. Here is a player who has a history of being overweight and struggled with the same problem last season.

He also reportedly has financial problems, yet can’t get into good enough shape to participate in minicamp. You have to question his commitment and when a team starts signing veteran offensive linemen and McKinnie gets held out of minicamp, it could be a sign of things to come.”

Comments on Facebook

2 Comments For This Post

  1. eric Says:

    Ben Grubbs at RG? I think you mean Yanda

    (Edit from Glenn: Yes. Thanks.)

  2. PghSteve Says:

    So SI.com says “Here is a player who has a history of being overweight and struggled with the same problem last season.(Isn’t this true?) “yet can’t get into good enough shape to participate in minicamp.”(Also true?) Where is the misinformation here? And in the SBNation blurb, except for the part about cutting McKinnie, which is just the author’s speculation, where is there misinformation here? Your own interview with McKinnie clearly shows that he was held out out of practice to work on running and lifting, aka conditioning work.

    Certainly, the 9 pounds that McKinnie self-reports that he is overweight does not seem to be a big deal, and it would not seem to be a reason to let him go before the season. However, some other questions do come to mind: Is he the only lineman to report to mini-camp 9 pounds or more overweight? Were other lineman held out for conditioning work?

    As for the bit about his financial situation, I agree that it seems irrelevant to the issue of McKinnie’s play on the football field.

    Keep up the good work.

    (Edit from Glenn: There’s this notion that he came in overweight. That’s not accurate. The organization wants him to play in the 345 range. He didn’t go from 345 to 354. He went the opposite way. They simply decided that the nature of minicamp made his participation irrelevant. If his weight was such an issue, he wouldn’t have been on the field practicing THE WEEK BEFORE. That part is passed over either A-beause the people writing these stories are unaware he was practicing one week earlier or B-because it just doesn’t fit a narrative that McKinnie is too fat and should be cut.)

Leave a Reply