The Peter Principles (Ch. 2): The error of tyranny at Camden Yards

March 30, 2014 | Nestor Aparicio

The Peter Principles (Ch. 2): The error of tyranny at Camden Yards

salaries and payroll. Their “give” was to agree to a revenue sharing plan that essentially punished (or taxed) teams that spent too much money, which was one of many things that insulted the union.

After all, for the players, it was as much about mistrust as it was pure greed. Over the previous two decades, the Major League Baseball Players Association had earned a reputation as the strongest union in sports, if not the entire country given the stature, platform and publicity it garnered when a whole industry of “stars” walk off the job. The players vowed to never limit their earning potential by agreeing to a salary cap. The players could point to the owners’ decades-long aggression, devious negotiating tactics and ill will and it all overflowed into this battle and public debate.

The owners had a long-standing reputation for playing dirty. The players had a long-standing reputation for staying solidified and united, which was preached by previous union leader Marvin Miller, who won his constituents hundreds of millions of dollars with this tactic and mantra.

This was far from the first battle for Peter Angelos. In many ways, it’s his favorite thing to do – battle, negotiate and posture.

In 1994, as a new member of the Lords of MLB, the first war for Angelos was with his fellow owners. He was barely initiated into the club and already the system of baseball’s new economics was quickly changing with new cities erecting new stadia at taxpayer expense and the competitors would be quickly catching up using Camden Yards as a model. For the Orioles, it was about getting the team to the field as quickly as possible. The Orioles were one of the rare teams in the sport boasting unprecedented financial success. And in places where baseball was struggling for attention, attendance and revenue, the strike was an unmitigated disaster in the public eye.

Angelos, however, didn’t need the players on the field to get his name in the newspaper. The timeline of his life, words and actions over the final six months of 1994 would shape the path of the franchise for the next two decades.

When the season faded into the strike in late summer, the sports talk chatter moved to whether Oates would return once the games were back on the field into 1995 or beyond. Angelos soon found out how insulated the baseball community was when he sloppily attempted to interview Oakland Athletics manager Tony LaRussa during the first week of October and then had to fire Oates because he found out about the dalliance.

“We wanted to talk to La Russa for some time,” Angelos told The Sun, “but we didn’t want it public. When it leaked out, it was embarrassing. We felt bad for Johnny. We said, we can’t subject him to this, and that’s why we had to act now. It was very difficult.”

After the Leo Gomez power play with Oates became public knowledge that summer, many MLB managerial candidates got the memo that Angelos would be meddling in the minutia of baseball. After Angelos had insulted Oates in The Washington Post, he wrote his manager a personal note and spelled his name wrong.

When Angelos was quizzed by Olesker at The Sun about his quickly-anointed reputation as a meddler he said: “I’ve heard those comparisons, that I’m another George Steinbrenner. Come on, I’m nothing like that. My policy is not to interfere with baseball. But that doesn’t mean I abandon my responsibility to the best interests of the club, and not protect its overall well-being.”

The candidates Angelos named as possible successors for the managerial role included Tony La Russa, Davey Johnson, Davey Lopes, Rick Dempsey, Bill Virdon, Buck Rodgers, Whitey Herzog and Phil Regan.

On October 11, assistant general manager Doug Melvin left the Orioles to go to the Texas Rangers, where he quickly hired Johnny Oates as his manager. On October 17, after passing on former Orioles player and World Series manager with the New York Mets Davey Johnson, who openly campaigned for the job, Angelos hired the pitching coach of the Cleveland Indians to be his first managerial hire. Phil Regan, whose nickname was “The Vulture” because he was a relief pitcher who came in late in games and often earned victories in 1960s, was on the radar of several

Comments on Facebook

5 Comments For This Post

  1. justafan Says:

    My problem with the Orioles is that they withhold opening day tickets from the average fan as an incentive to sell their various season ticket plans. As a result, fans who cannot afford a season ticket plan cannot get opening day tickets. This really ticks me off because I was able to get a ticket to the Nationals opening game without a hassle. The Orioles treat their average fans like a piece of excrement.

  2. justafan Says:

    Fortunately, I was able to get a ticket to the opening game on line yesterday. A good seat too! Section 328 in the lower boxes.

  3. Eddie Says:

    Imagine that , a successful business lasting a hundred years , run by all white wealthy males , anyone surprised by that ? I guess The Nationl Football League would fall into that catagory too . I wonder what we’d be watching for sports entertainment if it weren’t for those white rich guys , I shudder to think .

  4. RJ Says:

    Nestor,
    It intrigues me that you can forgive the Irsays for moving the Colts OUT of Baltimore, yet hammer Angelos continuously, even though the Os STILL remain in Baltimore…..certainly, I will never understand this dichotomy in thinking on your part. Sometimes I think you just want Angelos to give you some sort of recognition, which he will never do, nor should do given your incessant rants. But if it makes you feel better, go for it!

  5. jay Says:

    Eddie – Killer racist comment, but professional sports league have a league monopoly and enjoy quite a few benefits that most businesses do not, thus they have no competition that can operate with the same profit margins. Why don’t you shut the hell up before you go spouting of quasi-racist sentiments whilst having little to no idea what you are talking about, ok? THANKS!

Leave a Reply